When diamniotic twins suddenly become monoamniotic twins: spontaneous septostomy of the dividing membrane
- Angela Vidal ,
- Cristina Nastasia ,
- Markus Hodel and
- Joachim Kohl
- Departament of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Luzern, Luzern, Switzerland
- Correspondence to Dr Angela Vidal; vidalgutierrez.angelamaria@gmail.com
Abstract
In twin pregnancies, amnionicity and chorionicity are crucial as they strongly determine prenatal and perinatal management. First trimester ultrasound allows a highly reliable diagnosis of amnionicity and chorionicity, making it an internationally accepted standard in antenatal care. However, in rare cases, amnionicity can change from diamniotic to monoamniotic throughout pregnancy, substantially impacting perinatal management. We report the case of a confirmed monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy with a diagnosis of spontaneous septostomy of the dividing membrane (SSDM) at 28 weeks of gestation, resulting in a pseudomonoamniotic pregnancy. Even though SSDM is a rare condition and its sonographic diagnosis might be challenging, it should be considered if, in a known diamniotic pregnancy, there is a sudden failure to visualise the intertwin membrane truly separating both twins.
Background
The rate of twin pregnancies has increased by 70% in the past 30 years due to assisted reproductive techniques, family history and the increase in maternal age, reaching a rate of 32.1 for every 1000 pregnancies.1 The proportion of monozygotic twins, however, remained constant worldwide.
The diagnosis of chorionicity by obstetric ultrasonography plays an important role during the first trimester, because chorionicity is one of the main prognostic factors in twin pregnancy. Additionally, in monochorionic twins amnionicity is highly relevant the prenatal and perinatal management. Therefore, ultrasound has an important role in diagnosing chorionicity and amnionicity, generally starting in the early first trimester.2
The early and accurate diagnosis of chorionicity enables the identification of two twin pregnancy groups, thereby directing prenatal management for the early diagnosis of potential perinatal complications and providing a more appropriate treatment.2 3 Dichorionic pregnancies can be dizygotic or monozygotic and have no vascular communications between both placentas, while monochorionic pregnancies are virtually always monozygotic with placentar intertwin vascular anastomoses and are monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) or monochorionic monoamniotic (MCMA).4 5
Monochorionic twin pregnancies have a high risk for fetal complications such as preterm delivery, congenital anomalies, twin‐twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), selective intrauterine growth restriction (sIUGR) and the twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP) sequence. MCMA pregnancies (occurrence in 1% of all twin pregnancies) show the highest perinatal mortality of up to 70% due to the additional risk of umbilical cord entanglement causing fetal death. Moreover the diagnosis of TTTS might be challenging here due to the absence of oligohydramnios.3 6 Therefore, recommended prenatal check-up, management and the time of delivery differ between MCDA and MCMA twins.
One potential but very uncommon complication of MCDA pregnancies is spontaneous septostomy of the dividing membrane (SSDM), which results in a pseudomonoamniotic pregnancy with possible cord entanglement, thus increasing the rate of fetal complications and changing prenatal and perinatal management.6
In this article, we describe a case of MCDA twin pregnancy, which presented SSDM at 28 weeks of gestation.
Case presentation
A 39-year-old woman (IG/0P), pregnant with MCDA twins after in vitro fertilisation, was referred to our fetomaternal pregnancy unit at 13 weeks of gestation due to abnormal first-trimester screening results with a combined risk for trisomy 21 of 1:156 and a combined risk for trisomy 13 and 18 of 1:6610.
Ultrasonography confirmed an MCDA pregnancy with T-sign and fused posterior placenta (figure 1). The umbilical cord insertion sites were close to the insertion point of the dividing membrane (only 11 mm distance between the respective insertion sites). One of the fetuses was diagnosed with a single umbilical artery, but no further fetal malformation was found, and both fetuses’ growth was in accordance with the gestational age.
The ultrasound scan demonstrating an intact intertwin membrane at 12 weeks.
At 26 weeks of gestation, the fetus with a single umbilical artery was diagnosed with a recently emerged pleural effusion on the right side. There was no evidence of TTTS, fetal hydrops, fetal anaemia, fetal infection, volume overload or imminent fetal distress.
At 28 weeks of gestation, during a scheduled ultrasonography check-up, a free-floating intertwin membrane could be visualised (figure 2), but we failed to visualise the amniotic membranes separating both twins.
Spontaneous septostomy at 28 weeks. Ultrasound clearly identifies both twin A and B located on the same side of the intertwin membrane.
Detailed sonographic assessment gave rise to the suspicion of close contact between umbilical loops of both fetuses. Finally, a disruption in the intertwin membrane with a length of approximately 3 cm could be found close to the placental insertion site membrane, giving way to the passage of the umbilical cord with the single umbilical artery. Both fetuses were now found in one amniotic cavity.
The patient had not undergone any invasive procedure, infection or abdominal trauma. Both fetuses were well developed in accordance with the gestational age and the overall amount of amniotic fluid was normal.
We adapted our management according to an MCMA twin pregnancy. The patient was hospitalised for observation and antenatal corticosteroid administration for fetal lung maturation. The further course of pregnancy was monitored closely. The fetal pleural effusion remained stable, and there was no evidence for TTTS or cord entanglement with reassuring fetal heart rate patterns and regular Doppler waveforms of fetal vessels.
At 32 completed weeks of gestation, a caesarean section was performed, with no intraoperative or postoperative complications. The placental morphology confirmed MCDA twins (figure 3). The two placental cord insertions were 1 cm apart. The suspected disruption of the intertwine membrane with the passage of the umbilical cord was easily verified.
Placenta and amniotic membranes morphology.
Outcome and follow-up
The two female neonates weighted 1798 g (p59) and 1820 g (p62). They required initial respiratory support with continuous positive airway pressure due to respiratory distress but without additional oxygen for 5 days. The prenatally detected pleural effusion in one fetus was spontaneously regredient . At 39 days of life, the twins were discharged from the hospital.
Discussion
One potential but very uncommon complication of MCDA pregnancies is SSDM, which results in a pseudomonoamniotic pregnancy with possible cord entanglement, thus increasing the rate of fetal complications and changing prenatal and perinatal management.
The incidence of spontaneous rupture of the intertwin-dividing membrane is unknown. The scarcity of reports on SSDM in the literature suggests that this is not a common phenomenon. The aetiology of SSDM includes fetal trauma, infection and developmental disorder. In the current literature, the incidence of spontaneous septostomy in uncomplicated MCDA twin pregnancies is unknown, but 1.8% has been reported in a high-risk unit.4
Multiple aetiologies of SSDM have been described. The most common is traumatic disruption of the membrane that occurs due to invasive procedures such as amniocentesis, cordocentesis, amnioreduction and laser ablation. Maternal abdominal trauma with concurrent SSDM has also been reported. Other possible causes due to abnormal membrane development have been suggested as chorioamnionitis, fetal movement, amniotic plica and increase of amniotic fluid pressure with polyhydramnios.4 7 8
A retrospective study by Chmait in 2009 with 217 complicated MCDA pregnancies with no prior invasive procedures but with suspicion of TTTS, sIUGR and TRAP sequence or discordant anomalous twins, reported an incidence of SSDM in 1.8% (four cases). This high incidence might be explained by the selected risk patients in this group and TTTS and TRAP with polyhydramnios as a potential risk factor for SSDM.4 9 10
According to Chmait, the most useful sonographic findings for the SSDM diagnosis are: absence or interruption of the dividing membrane; both fetuses occupying the same side of the dividing membrane; umbilical cord entanglement and excess amniotic fluid on both sides of the dividing membrane, with characteristics suggestive of TTTS. The diagnosis of TTTS might be challenging here due to the absence of oligohydramnios.2 3 6
In our case, only the first and second of these ultrasound characteristics were present. We observed no entanglement either on antenatal ultrasound or postnatally.
A review of the literature, revealed 38 cases of SSDM, and associated prenatal complications included fetal and neonatal death secondary to cord entanglement, premature rupture of membranes, premature labour and amniotic band syndrome. This stresses the importance of exclusion of associated anomalies including amputation, constriction bands, syndactyly, craniofacial defects, clubfeet and cleft lip.4 5 7 8 11–13 The neonates’ perinatal mortality rate was as high as 44%, and the mean gestational age at birth was 29 weeks (range 22–34 weeks).7
Prompt recognition of SSDM in MCDA twin pregnancies is important because it can help to establish follow-up guidelines to detect the previously mentioned potential complications, especially umbilical cord entanglement,2 a condition reported by López Ramón and Cajal in a series with five cases of true umbilical cord knot.9 The authors observed a cross-sectional image of the umbilical cord with its three vessels, surrounded by a complete loop; a condition termed the ‘hanging noose’ sign, which represents a characteristic ultrasound image.
Data from a 2019 systematic review and meta-analysis showed that fetal loss occurs in 1% of MCMA twins at 31–32 weeks and 2% at 33–34 weeks of pregnancy14 Double fetal death occurs in approximately 2% of MCMA twins at 33–34 weeks of pregnancy.14 Currently, elective delivery at 32 weeks appears to be the most appropriate decision; however, the risk of neonatal morbidity needs to be considered.
The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists issued guidelines in 2016 for managing monochorionic twin pregnancies,14 which clarified that MCMA twin pregnancies have a high risk of fetal death and should be delivered by caesarean section between 32 0/7 and 34 0/7 weeks. Although the condition is fairly rare, SSDM should be considered for an MCDA that shows any of the indicators for SSDM given above—even with no history of invasive surgery, preterm premature rupture of the membranes or invasive prenatal diagnosis, which clarified that MCMA twin pregnancies have a high risk of fetal death and should be delivered by caesarean section between 32 0/7 and 34 0/7 weeks. Although the condition is fairly rare, SSDM should be considered for an MCDA, even with no history of invasive surgery, preterm premature rupture of the membrane, or invasive prenatal diagnosis that shows any of the indicators for SSDM given above.
The principle of gestational management of pseudoamniotic twin pregnancy is to minimise the risk to the fetuses. Possible complications such as umbilical cord entanglement and particularly high perinatal morbidity demand antepartum management similar to that of a functional monoamniotic gestational pregnancy. Early diagnosis of possible complications is very essential, so weekly ultrasound assessment for hydrops, TTTS, assessment of fetal growth is recommended. Depending on the various risk factors and the gestational age, ideally 32–34 weeks, the decision to delivery should be considered.
Consequently, in an MCDA pregnancy, the recommendation should be to frequently evaluate the intertwin membrane by ultrasound. Suppose the dividing membrane could not be observed in ultrasound. One should consider the possibility of spontaneous antepartum septostomy, which would require meticulous observation of the pregnancy entailing a different planning of delivery.11 14
In conclusion, the diagnosis of SSDM poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges as it might easily be overlooked but is possible and helpful to avoid complications of complications typical for MCMA pregnancies in MCDA twins.
Learning points
-
Spontaneous septostomy of the dividing membrane (SSDM) occurring in monochorionic diamniotic twins is extremely rare.
-
Prenatal diagnosis management of SSDM can be challenging but is possible.
-
The diagnosis of SSDM implies an important change of the obstetrical management to avoid complications typical for monochorionic monoamniotic pregnancies.
Ethics statements
Footnotes
-
Contributors AV conceived the presented idea and perdormed the literatur research. Treatment was carried out by JK and MH. The manuscript was drafted by AV and CN and crttically reviewed by all authors. The final manuscript was approved by all authors.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer